Thursday, May 30, 2019

The Recipe for Nature Essay -- Daniel Dennett Algorithm Essays

The Recipe for NatureMissing Works CitedNature is a fluid coalescence of complex magnificence resolving powering from an algorithmic mastery of simplicity. It is no doubt an awe-inspiring entity that invokes both great curiosity and bafflement in those who attempt to estimate for its existence and splendor. It is often seen as overly reductionistic, if not grievous, to try to condense the (mindless?) brilliance of nature through any sort of mechanistic or logical means. And here we are faced with what Daniel Dennett calls Darwins weighty idea that all the fruits of evolution can be explained as the products of an algorithmic deal (Dennett, 1995 p.60). It is no surprise that this idea might present a worry for the Homo-sapien ego, as it jeopardizes our egocentric concept of inborn superiority, as well as fails to satisfy our almost insatiable need to directly account for the expansiveness of the mankind around us. That is, for many of us it is somehow pessimistic, if not fatal istic, to be satisfied with the idea that we are products of nothing more than a mindless mechanical process (what a dangerous idea this is) (Dennett, 1995 p.60). The question then inevitably arises Is Darwins theory of natural selection really powerful enough to can account for all of the worlds design campaign (i.e., the time, energy and development needed to produce a complex outcome)? (Dennett, 1995) The answer is yes, but only subsequently nature has been unraveled in terms of an algorithmic design and only after the many misunderstandings of Darwins fundamental ideas have been rectified. If we are to discuss nature and natural selection in terms of being an algorithmic process, we must first define what is meant by an algorithm. An... ...Principle of Accumulation of Design refers to the fact that the complexity of design work found in nature can be accounted for, not by a definite design process preformed by a designer, but by a different sort of process that distributed t hat work over huge amounts of time, by thriftily conserving the design work that had been accomplished at each stage, so that it didnt have to be done over again (Dennett, 68). This idea of distributed design work is certainly in line with natures belatedly advancement in terms of complexity and order of organisms (Dennett, 69). Furthermore, the Principle of Accumulation of Design does not apply to work done as a result of a single unifying algorithmic process, but to the work done by a large class of related algorithms, the conglomeration of which is responsible for the complexity found in nature today (Dennett, 51).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.